Investor profile - FL

Neta Hirsch

Neta Hirsch is a real estate investor and operator based in Miami-Fort Lauderdale, FL. Public filings show activity across 5 properties held through 6 holding companies. Recent mortgage relationships include OptimumBank and WAVEPOINT INVESTMENTS.

Contact info available

Neta's Activity

As of December 2025, public records show approximately $2.7M in recorded mortgage exposure linked to this investor across at least 3 mortgage filings and 5 properties held through 6 holding companies. Activity appears concentrated in residential assets recorded between 2015 and 2023.

Primary Geography

Miami-Fort Lauderdale, FL

ZIP codes: 33060, 33127, 33311, 33334, and 33441

Most recorded activity for this investor appears in FORT LAUDERDALE, DEERFIELD BEACH, POMPANO BEACH, and MIAMI.

Property Type Breakdown

Residential100%

Associated Entities (6)

NA PROFESSIONALS LLC

FL · 3 properties · 2 mortgages

active
Incorporated on 06/14/2010 in FL
NA PROFESSIONAL LLC

FL · 0 properties · 1 mortgage

SPERIN LLC

FL · 0 properties · 0 mortgages

inactive
Incorporated on 01/26/2009 in FL

+3 more not shown

Mortgages (3)

Top Lenders

OptimumBank
OptimumBank

$2.6M · 2 loans

WAVEPOINT INVESTMENTS
WAVEPOINT INVESTMENTS

$93k · 1 loan

DateAmountStatusLenderBorrowerAddress
02/10/2020$1.3MOpenOptimumBankNA PROFESSIONALS LLC-
02/03/2020$1.3MOpenOptimumBankNA PROFESSIONALS LLC-
03/14/2017$93kOpenWAVEPOINT INVESTMENTSNA PROFESSIONAL LLC-

+0 more not shown

Owned Properties (5)

AddressDeeded ownerStatusConsideration
91 NW 51ST ST,
MIAMI, FL 33127
NA PROFESSIONALS LLCSold$185k
91 NE 45TH CT,
FORT LAUDERDALE, FL 33334
NA PROFESSIONALS LLCSold$138k
1281 SW 6TH WAY,
DEERFIELD BEACH, FL 33441
NA PROFESSIONALS LLCSold$118k

+2 more not shown

FAQ

What type of real estate does this investor focus on?

Associated mortgages and deeds show activity in residential properties across Miami-Fort Lauderdale, FL.

What companies is Neta Hirsch associated with?

Neta Hirsch is associated with 6 entities based on extracted signatures from public records. Key entities include NA PROFESSIONALS LLC, NA PROFESSIONAL LLC, SPERIN LLC, HERMITAGE PROPERTIES LLC, and NA REAL INVESTMENTS LLC.

How many properties are associated with this investor?

At least 5 properties are associated with Neta Hirsch and the entities they control, based on signatures extracted from recorded documents connecting Neta Hirsch to the entities.

Which lenders has this investor worked with?

Recent mortgage activity references OptimumBank and WAVEPOINT INVESTMENTS, indicating a mix of lending relationships.

How recent is their activity?

Records show activity from 2015 through 2023, with the most recent mortgage recorded in 2020.

How is associated activity determined?

Elementix uses AI to extract signatures from recorded documents. These signatures are used to determine the relationships between people and entities. This is a novel approach that goes beyond looking at corporate filings and skip-tracing.

The information displayed on this page is compiled from recorded real estate documents, business filings, and other lawfully available sources. Elementix summarizes and analyzes public record activity related to investment real estate and associated business entities. Any contact indicators shown (such as email domain references or partial phone digits) are provided solely as unverified signals and may be incomplete or outdated.

Elementix is not a consumer reporting agency, and this information does not constitute a consumer report. The data may not be used to make decisions about an individual's eligibility for personal credit, consumer housing, employment, insurance, or any other purpose governed by the Fair Credit Reporting Act.

Elementix may suppress certain contact indicators where legally required or where appropriate for safety or privacy reasons. Requests for removal, suppression, or correction of information must be submitted to compliance@elementix.ai. Elementix reviews such requests only where required by applicable law or where information is factually inaccurate. General objections or unsupported demands do not create a removal obligation.