Investor profile - TX
Smit Shah
Smit Shah is a real estate investor and operator based in Dallas-Fort Worth, TX. Public filings show activity across 6 properties held through 16 holding companies. Recent mortgage relationships include COMMERCE NATL BANK A BRANCH OF LUBBOCK NATL BANK, Comerica Bank, and ORIGIN BANK.
Smit's Activity
As of December 2025, public records show approximately $14.5M in recorded mortgage exposure linked to this investor across at least 29 mortgage filings and 6 properties held through 16 holding companies. Activity appears concentrated in residential and commercial assets recorded between 2015 and 2025.
Primary Geography
Dallas-Fort Worth, TX
ZIP codes: 76244, 76054, 76148, and 78621
Most recorded activity for this investor appears in FORT WORTH, ELGIN, WATAUGA, and HURST.
Property Type Breakdown
Associated Entities (16)
TX · 123 properties · 28 mortgages
TX · 2 properties · 9 mortgages
TX · 1 property · 4 mortgages
+13 more not shown
Mortgages (29)
Top Lenders
$7.0M · 4 loans
$3.8M · 4 loans
$3.3M · 2 loans
| Date | Amount | Status | Lender | Borrower | Address |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 11/25/2025 | $0 | Open | Cadence Bank | SR MANSFIELD PROPERTY FUND IV LLC | - |
| 08/14/2025 | $0 | Open | Cadence Bank | SP CAPSTONE GROUP LLC | - |
| 06/06/2025 | $2.0M | Open | Comerica Bank | SP WA II DEVELOPMENT LLC | 8239 RUFE SNOW DR, FORT WORTH, TX 76148 |
+26 more not shown
Owned Properties (6)
| Address | Deeded owner | Status | Consideration |
|---|---|---|---|
| 18200 SPECULATOR LN, ELGIN, TX 78621 | KASHYAPKUMAR PATEL | Owns - 3.6 yrs | $0 |
| 5932 DENTON HWY, WATAUGA, TX 76148 | SP WA DEVELOPMENT LLC | Owns - 4.1 yrs | $2.5M |
| 4940 N TARRANT PKWY, FORT WORTH, TX 76244 | SP FW DEVELOPMENT LLC | Owns - 4.2 yrs | $2.3M |
+3 more not shown
FAQ
What type of real estate does this investor focus on?
Associated mortgages and deeds show activity in residential and commercial properties across Dallas-Fort Worth, TX.
What companies is Smit Shah associated with?
Smit Shah is associated with 16 entities based on extracted signatures from public records. Key entities include RACETRAC PETROLEUM INC, SP COMMERCIAL REAL ESTATE LLC, SP FRISCO LAKE DEVELOPMENT LLC, SP WA DEVELOPMENT LLC, and SP CAPSTONE GROUP LLC.
How many properties are associated with this investor?
At least 6 properties are associated with Smit Shah and the entities they control, based on signatures extracted from recorded documents connecting Smit Shah to the entities.
Which lenders has this investor worked with?
Recent mortgage activity references COMMERCE NATL BANK A BRANCH OF LUBBOCK NATL BANK, Comerica Bank, and ORIGIN BANK, indicating a mix of lending relationships.
How recent is their activity?
Records show activity from 2015 through 2025, with the most recent mortgage recorded in 2025.
How is associated activity determined?
Elementix uses AI to extract signatures from recorded documents. These signatures are used to determine the relationships between people and entities. This is a novel approach that goes beyond looking at corporate filings and skip-tracing.
The information displayed on this page is compiled from recorded real estate documents, business filings, and other lawfully available sources. Elementix summarizes and analyzes public record activity related to investment real estate and associated business entities. Any contact indicators shown (such as email domain references or partial phone digits) are provided solely as unverified signals and may be incomplete or outdated.
Elementix is not a consumer reporting agency, and this information does not constitute a consumer report. The data may not be used to make decisions about an individual's eligibility for personal credit, consumer housing, employment, insurance, or any other purpose governed by the Fair Credit Reporting Act.
Elementix may suppress certain contact indicators where legally required or where appropriate for safety or privacy reasons. Requests for removal, suppression, or correction of information must be submitted to compliance@elementix.ai. Elementix reviews such requests only where required by applicable law or where information is factually inaccurate. General objections or unsupported demands do not create a removal obligation.