Investor profile - IL

Cari Hartmann

Cari Hartmann is a real estate investor and operator based in Chicago, IL-IN-WI. Public filings show activity across 65 properties held through 19 holding companies.

Contact info available

Cari's Activity

As of December 2025, public records show approximately $0 in recorded mortgage exposure linked to this investor across at least 0 mortgage filings and 65 properties held through 19 holding companies. Activity appears concentrated in residential and multifamily assets recorded between 2015 and 2025.

Primary Geography

Chicago, IL-IN-WI

ZIP codes: 60617, 60628, 60091, 60461, and 60462

Most recorded activity for this investor appears in CHICAGO, ORLAND PARK, OAK PARK, COUNTRY CLUB HILLS, and ALSIP.

Property Type Breakdown

Residential85%
Multifamily15%

Associated Entities (19)

US BANK NA

IL · 14,484 properties · 67 mortgages

US BANK TRUST NA

IL · 2,258 properties · 3 mortgages

US BANK NA NOT IN ITS INDIVIDUAL CAPACITY BUT SOLELY AS TRUSTEE FOR THE RMAC TRUST SERIES 2016 TT1

IL · 0 properties · 0 mortgages

+16 more not shown

Mortgages (0)

DateAmountStatusLenderBorrowerAddress

+0 more not shown

Owned Properties (65)

AddressDeeded ownerStatusConsideration
9241 S KINGSTON AVE,
CHICAGO, IL 60617
JP MORGAN MORTGAGE ACQUISITION CORPSold$0
3850 TIMBERS EDGE LN,
GLENVIEW, IL 60025
US BANK NA NOT IN ITS INDIVIDUAL CAPACITY BUT SOLELY AS TRUSTEE FOR THE RMAC TRUST SERIES 2016 CTTSold$0
418 N 5TH AVE,
MAYWOOD, IL 60153
US BANK NA NOT IN ITS INDIVIDUAL CAPACITY BUT SOLELY AS TRUSTEE FOR THE RMAC TRUST SERIES 2016 CTTSold$0

+62 more not shown

FAQ

What type of real estate does this investor focus on?

Associated mortgages and deeds show activity in residential and multifamily properties across Chicago, IL-IN-WI.

What companies is Cari Hartmann associated with?

Cari Hartmann is associated with 19 entities based on extracted signatures from public records. Key entities include US BANK NA, US BANK TRUST NA, US BANK NA NOT IN ITS INDIVIDUAL CAPACITY BUT SOLELY AS TRUSTEE FOR THE RMAC TRUST SERIES 2016 TT1, US BANK NA NOT IN ITS INDIVIDUAL CAPACITY BUT SOLELY AS TRUSTEE FOR THE RMAC TRUST SERIES 2016 CT, and WELLS FARGO BANK NA SUCCESSOR BY MERGER TO WACHOVIA BANK NA.

How many properties are associated with this investor?

At least 65 properties are associated with Cari Hartmann and the entities they control, based on signatures extracted from recorded documents connecting Cari Hartmann to the entities.

Which lenders has this investor worked with?

Recent mortgage activity references , indicating a mix of lending relationships.

How recent is their activity?

Records show activity from 2015 through 2025, with the most recent mortgage recorded in 1970.

How is associated activity determined?

Elementix uses AI to extract signatures from recorded documents. These signatures are used to determine the relationships between people and entities. This is a novel approach that goes beyond looking at corporate filings and skip-tracing.

The information displayed on this page is compiled from recorded real estate documents, business filings, and other lawfully available sources. Elementix summarizes and analyzes public record activity related to investment real estate and associated business entities. Any contact indicators shown (such as email domain references or partial phone digits) are provided solely as unverified signals and may be incomplete or outdated.

Elementix is not a consumer reporting agency, and this information does not constitute a consumer report. The data may not be used to make decisions about an individual's eligibility for personal credit, consumer housing, employment, insurance, or any other purpose governed by the Fair Credit Reporting Act.

Elementix may suppress certain contact indicators where legally required or where appropriate for safety or privacy reasons. Requests for removal, suppression, or correction of information must be submitted to compliance@elementix.ai. Elementix reviews such requests only where required by applicable law or where information is factually inaccurate. General objections or unsupported demands do not create a removal obligation.