Investor profile - CA
Ku Kim
Ku Kim is a real estate investor and operator based in Los Angeles, CA. Public filings show activity across 4 properties held through 8 holding companies. Recent mortgage relationships include California Coast Credit Union, SECURED INCOME FUND II, and Hanmi Bank.
Ku's Activity
As of December 2025, public records show approximately $4.3M in recorded mortgage exposure linked to this investor across at least 10 mortgage filings and 4 properties held through 8 holding companies. Activity appears concentrated in industrial and commercial assets recorded between 2010 and 2023.
Associated People
Primary Geography
Los Angeles, CA
ZIP codes: 91746, 91730, and 92831
Most recorded activity for this investor appears in LA PUENTE, FULLERTON, and RANCHO CUCAMONGA.
Property Type Breakdown
Associated Entities (8)
CA · 2 properties · 4 mortgages
CA · 3 properties · 4 mortgages
CA · 2 properties · 1 mortgage
+5 more not shown
Mortgages (10)
Top Lenders
$3.4M · 1 loan
$590k · 1 loan
$300k · 1 loan
| Date | Amount | Status | Lender | Borrower | Address |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 11/13/2023 | $300k | Open | Hanmi Bank | PHILTARP LLC | 1974 N PLACENTIA AVE, FULLERTON, CA 92831 |
| 10/11/2019 | $3.4M | Open | California Coast Credit Union | NAMU PROPERTIES CORP | 13914 VALLEY BLVD, LA PUENTE, CA 91746 |
| 09/07/2018 | $825k | Closed | OLD GOLDEN OAKS | GENTIUM GOLF LLC | 1653 S HWY 26, VALLEY SPRINGS, CA 95252 |
+7 more not shown
Owned Properties (4)
| Address | Deeded owner | Status | Consideration |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1974 N PLACENTIA AVE, FULLERTON, CA 92831 | PHILTARP LLC | Owns - 4.5 yrs | $2.8M |
| 13932 VALLEY BLVD, LA PUENTE, CA 91746 | NAMU PROPERTIES CORP | Owns - 6.2 yrs | $11.2M |
| 13914 VALLEY BLVD, LA PUENTE, CA 91746 | NAMU PROPERTIES CORP | Owns - 6.2 yrs | $11.2M |
+1 more not shown
FAQ
What type of real estate does this investor focus on?
Associated mortgages and deeds show activity in industrial, commercial, and residential properties across Los Angeles, CA.
What companies is Ku Kim associated with?
Ku Kim is associated with 8 entities based on extracted signatures from public records. Key entities include NAMU PROPERTIES CORP, GENTIUM AMADOR LLC, PHILTARP LLC, GENTIUM GOLF LLC, and BERENDO PROPERTY LLC.
How many properties are associated with this investor?
At least 4 properties are associated with Ku Kim and the entities they control, based on signatures extracted from recorded documents connecting Ku Kim to the entities.
Which lenders has this investor worked with?
Recent mortgage activity references California Coast Credit Union, SECURED INCOME FUND II, and Hanmi Bank, indicating a mix of lending relationships.
How recent is their activity?
Records show activity from 2010 through 2023, with the most recent mortgage recorded in 2023.
How is associated activity determined?
Elementix uses AI to extract signatures from recorded documents. These signatures are used to determine the relationships between people and entities. This is a novel approach that goes beyond looking at corporate filings and skip-tracing.
The information displayed on this page is compiled from recorded real estate documents, business filings, and other lawfully available sources. Elementix summarizes and analyzes public record activity related to investment real estate and associated business entities. Any contact indicators shown (such as email domain references or partial phone digits) are provided solely as unverified signals and may be incomplete or outdated.
Elementix is not a consumer reporting agency, and this information does not constitute a consumer report. The data may not be used to make decisions about an individual's eligibility for personal credit, consumer housing, employment, insurance, or any other purpose governed by the Fair Credit Reporting Act.
Elementix may suppress certain contact indicators where legally required or where appropriate for safety or privacy reasons. Requests for removal, suppression, or correction of information must be submitted to compliance@elementix.ai. Elementix reviews such requests only where required by applicable law or where information is factually inaccurate. General objections or unsupported demands do not create a removal obligation.